The ________ case held that a farmer's production of wheat for use only on his own farm was held to impact interstate commerce.

A) Gibbons v.Ogden
B) Wickard v.Filburn
C) Hughes v.Wendel
D) Mangus v.Miller

Question

Jordan wojo324 · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : B, Explanation :  The Wickard v. Filburn case, decided in 1942, held that even if a farmer grows wheat for personal consumption on his own farm, it still has an impact on interstate commerce because it affects the overall demand for wheat, which could potentially affect the price of wheat in other parts of the country. This case greatly expanded the federal government's power to regulate economic activity under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

The ________ case held that a farmer's production of wheat for use only on his own farm was held to impact interstate commerce.

A) Gibbons v.Ogden
B) Wickard v.Filburn
C) Hughes v.Wendel
D) Mangus v.Miller

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

The ________ case held that a farmer's production of wheat for use only on his own farm was held to impact interstate commerce.A) Gibbons v.OgdenB) Wickard v.FilburnC) Hughes v.WendelD) Mangus v.Miller

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

The ________ case held that a farmer's production of wheat for use only on his own farm was held to impact interstate commerce.

A) Gibbons v.Ogden
B) Wickard v.Filburn
C) Hughes v.Wendel
D) Mangus v.Miller